• @ceenote
    link
    56
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Well that’s nice. I’ve worked multiple salaried positions where the unspoken rule obviously was “We can’t explicitly tell you to work more than 40 hours per week, we’re just going to strongly imply that you have no potential for advancement here if you don’t put in extra time.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      443 days ago

      I worked a job where not getting your tasks done would result in termination. Working overtime required permission from management, who never gave it. Working overtime unauthorized was also a fireable offence. The way it was phrased was “lots of employees work unauthorized overtime to get their work done, but they don’t ask for payment, so we look the other way.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      223 days ago

      Last time I applied, I filtered out anyone requiring 40h/week.
      I now work 35h/week, with 42 days PTO I can (actually, have to) take.
      Pay is for a full time position and supports my wife and me comfortably.
      Flexibility is given, I just (at 8pm) told my team leader I won’t be coming in tomorrow.
      My resumé isn’t exactly an HR department’s dream, I got a BSc in Ecology when I was 31.

      I guess what I’m trying to say is, what you’re describing isn’t normal. And it shouldn’t, and doesn’t have to be, either.

      • @toynbee
        link
        15
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        So where do you work?

        edit: Though, based on some of the terms you used and the fact that you got a favorable employment agreement, I doubt it’s a country that would consider me.

      • @ceenote
        link
        3
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I have. But, in construction engineering, that expectation is pretty commonplace. To be fair, they offered straight pay for OT. I’ve never heard of anyone giving time and a half for it.