• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5413 hours ago

    I still don’t understand why this isn’t a 2.5G WAN and 2.5G LAN. Is it assuming that people are going to be using it as a router on a stick with a 1G WAN?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      116 minutes ago

      Nerd here. You confuse me:

      WAN is some up-/downstream port connecting intranets remotely in my novice book. The measurement G doesn’t refer to some advertisement-thingy in terms of wireless speed (but Gigabyte) - Maybe it’s some form of Generation; But then I lack everything including my false base knowledge. Additionally I have never encountered “2.5G LAN” ever before: Would you be able to shed light on my shortcomings? 2.5 x 8 is 20 Gbit. I didn’t read about that size yet.

      • @MorphiusFaydal
        link
        English
        111 minutes ago

        WAN would be the Internet uplink port. A 2.5G WAN port is a 2.5 gigabit Ethernet port. 2.5 gigabit and o a lesser extent 5 gigabit Ethernet are a standard that’s becoming rapidly available on a lot of hardware. OP is stating that for a device shipping near the end of 2024, a new router that is shipping with only 1 GbE instead of 2.5 GbE is a problem.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 hours ago

          I know what a Wide Area Network is. I’m just saying the acronym is ambiguous since the advent of WiFi

          • @MorphiusFaydal
            link
            English
            113 minutes ago

            Not really. WAN has always been WAN. Wireless has always been WLAN.

    • @nialv7
      link
      English
      109 hours ago

      most likely because this device is mainly for wifi use, and/or limitation of the SoC.