Note that accounts on both networks must follow the main bridge account to work.

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    1810 days ago

    Kinda wish we had actual interoperability standards instead.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1310 days ago

      We have that, it’s called ActivityPub. BlueSky wouldn’t want that tho, they couldn’t control the entire network then, after all.

      • @woelkchenM
        link
        English
        410 days ago

        If the BlueSky protocol offers tangible benefits over ActivityPub, the BlueSky protocol could become the basis for ActivityPub 2.0. I don’t know much about the details, though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          610 days ago

          The BlueSky protocol relies on central servers tho, I’m not sure if there’s much that ActivityPub can take inspiration from

          • @Twoafros
            link
            English
            29 days ago

            Non technical person here, I would love to hear more about how decentralized (or not decentralized) the Bluesky protocol is compared to ActivityPub

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Here is a good blogpost about it

              https://taggart-tech.com/20241124-bluesky-questions-pt1/

              Check out this mastodon thread and associated links

              https://social.wildeboer.net/@jwildeboer/113504285308484716

              TL;DR Bluesky is not functionally federated nor decentralized, it is dubious if it ever will be and the layer of post sorting and moderation required to participate in Bluesky’s network is extremely computationally intensive and this aspect of Bluesky is NOT open source and is a proprietary black box.

              The fediverse and activity pub are the future, even if the current hype train leaving the station (…who is paying for all the free drinks on that train and why?) makes it feel otherwise in the short term.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 days ago

        The lack of account portability means activitypub is unsuitable for both bsky and just in general.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 days ago

          They could have also worked to implement that into ActivityPub but they still chose to reinvent the wheel

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Yeah, bluesky has a bunch of features, notably account portability, which was specifically designed into the ATProtocol.

          The purpose of the ATProtocol was never to federate with Activitypub, it was to build a more feature rich and scalable “federated” protocol.

          Read More