All (action)games I know of don’t have real and proper surface collision detection, except some physics games. Just an example: If my Char hits something or someone the weapon goes straight through without any physical reaction, it just counts the damage I’ve done. Are there any games out there, in which physics are calculated correctly and taken into visual account?!

  • NONE
    link
    English
    2621 hours ago

    Well, you already say it: physics games. They NEEDS to be accurate with their collision detection since they relay on it to the game to be fun. The majority of action games don’t need such accuracy cuz THAT IS NOT FUN. You know how frustrating is to swing your sword in a narrow passage in Dark Souls to it to bounce on the walls?

    Also, is a extremely demanding process to calculate such precise collisions.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      520 hours ago

      If some geniuses do invent a robust framework for physics based combat which results in realistic sword swings unlike Dark Souls’ bounce/no-bounce mechanic, it will be very fun

      The damage could be calculated depending on how powerful the swing was and where it hit the enemy. I fantasize about this often

      • skulblaka
        link
        fedilink
        English
        514 hours ago

        Exanima does this.

        Its a little bit half baked right now but it’s been under construction for the better part of a decade. I think the plan now is to use Exanima as a proof of concept and then pivot that technology into a “real” game. But I find it very fun in its current state and does exactly what you’re asking for.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          313 hours ago

          Exanima is basically the prequel to the main game they are also currently working on (Sui Generis).
          It’s also planned to have multiplayer after the story part is finished.

      • NONE
        link
        English
        115 hours ago

        Sound good, but it would be more suitable to VR games where you can be more precise to where to attack and how.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      120 hours ago

      Maybe you’re right. So, IMHO, there seems to be a niche for a game with a sweet spot between accurate physics and fun?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        819 hours ago

        The niche isnt there because its not really practical. No consumer device can run modern high poly 3D structures with full physics simulation in real time. There is a reason why the only physics sim games are very low poly. And even those are performance hungry despite custom engines.

        Realistic physics for realistic looking scenes is something that you give to a renderfarm that will throw 100+ times more compute at it than the most expensive consumer GPU on the market.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          219 hours ago

          Thx for your answer. Sounds logic and plausible and I didn’t thought about the effort for the actual physics calculations.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 hours ago

            It wasn’t for me, but I’ve heard that some people like Noita, which is built around granular physics interactions.

            Oxygen Not Included was more my speed, but that’s more about complex, larger systems (like fluid dynamics and heat) than collision.

      • NONE
        link
        English
        220 hours ago

        Maybe games with destructible structures? It depends on which is the main mechanic of the game, if it’s relays on physics, there would be accurate collision detection (or at least as accurate as it needs them to be).