Summary

Bolivia faces an economic collapse due to a fuel shortage, foreign currency reserves depletion, and rising inflation.

The crisis has led to protests, food shortages, and a decline in the government’s popularity.

The government’s denial of the problems and its handling of the situation have further exacerbated the situation.

  • @Paragone
    link
    English
    112 days ago

    tax fuel to the point where your economy freezes/dies, & now you have civil-war on your hands…

    Subsidize the stuff, & you may postpone it…

    Sometimes politics enforces that you act against strategic-viability in order to protect your currently-existing “government”…

    Politics isn’t strategic: it is tactical, only…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 days ago

      I mean, sure, we shouldn’t put a 5,000% tax on gasoline tomorrow or anything. But more reasonable taxes implemented gradually would gently incentivize us toward alternatives, while also allowing us to decrease other taxes that are regressive and harm economic efficiency.

      • @Paragone
        link
        English
        210 days ago

        Your insight that taxes need to be corrected gradually is right.

        Technically, each economy would have its own powerlaws for correcting taxes, regulations, etc, so in 1 economy it would be something like…

        The current tax on this is a%, the all-future-costs-included tax, which makes the creators-of-those-costs pay them up-front, is b%,

        so this year we’re changing the tax from a% to (( 5 * a ) + ( 1 * b )) / 6

        or something like that…

        Always tending towards the correct rate…

        That rendition would give 6y for reaching equilibrium.

        The more-agile the economy, the quicker it could calibrate to truth…


        The political reality, however, won’t permit that, will it?

        _ /\ _

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 days ago

          Maybe? I readily admit that voters generally don’t think very far ahead and this stuff isn’t an easy sell, but every once in a while a leader does manage to successfully make the argument that we should accept some amount of short term pain in exchange for a greater benefit in the long term.