I tried to make an AI summary of the article but it somehow thought that Biden beat Trump in 2024 so I’m throwing that away.

This is part 1 of a ongoing 3 part series looking at the Harris campaign. Mostly based on her campaign management’s recent podcast appearance(s) and statistics from the election results.

  • @just_another_person
    link
    -315 days ago

    Pretty sure Tim is not going to like the use of this image, and there will be a takedown request.

        • Snot Flickerman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          That “banner image” in the link here comes from the embedded YouTube video in the post. It isn’t actually a banner image.

          So what, praytell, is Tim Robinson gonna ask him to take down? The fair use of a YouTube link?

          You know, sometimes actually clicking on the link and looking at it before you post some dumb shit helps.

            • Snot Flickerman
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              Okay, doubling down on being an idiot and not understanding how any of this works. Got it.

              It’s an embedded video from the official Netflix account which owns the rights to I Think You Should Leave. Nothing is being used here that can be taken as a copyright strike because you’re allowed to embed this video.

              • @just_another_person
                link
                -514 days ago

                They’ve been taking this meme down everywhere. Not doubling down, just saying it’s a certainty. They’ll claim right at YT, this link will no longer work as an embed, and that’s it.

                • Snot Flickerman
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11
                  edit-2
                  14 days ago

                  Netflix runs the Youtube account, they’re literally the owners of the content (moreso than Tim Robinson!). If they didn’t want it to be embedded, they wouldn’t have made that an option when they uploaded the video four years ago. If they’ve been “taking it down everywhere” why is it still embeddable at all? Because if it had already been taken down, it wouldn’t be embeddable anywhere not just on a specific site.

                  How much crack have you smoked, man?

    • @kreskin
      link
      0
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      pretty sure no one here cares about that image but you. Are you crowdsourcing meaningless copyright enforcement? Why are you wasting everyones time with this?