• circuitfarmer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1219 hours ago

    It would require thousands if not tens of thousands of Google semployees coordinating in utter secrecy

    This is usually used for things like the Moon Landing, where so many folks worked for NASA to make it entirely impossible that the landing was faked.

    But it doesn’t really apply here. We know for example that NSA backdoors exist in Windows. Were those a concerted effort by MS employees? Does everyone working on the project have access to every part of the code?

    It just isn’t how development works at this scale.

    • @rottingleaf
      link
      English
      29 hours ago

      This is usually used for things like the Moon Landing, where so many folks worked for NASA to make it entirely impossible that the landing was faked.

      I think it’s also confirmed by radio transmissions from the Moon received in real time right then by USSR and other countries.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      316 hours ago

      Ok but no one is arguing Windows is encrypted. Google is specifically stating, in a way that could get them sued for shitloads of money, that their messaging protocol is E2EE. They have explicitly described how it is E2EE. Google can be a bad company while still doing this thing within the bounds we all understand. For example, just because the chat can’t be backdoored doesn’t mean the device can’t be.

      • @rottingleaf
        link
        English
        19 hours ago

        Telegram has its supposedly E2EE protocol which isn’t used by most of Telegram users, but also there have been a few questionable traits found in it.

        Google is trusted a bit more than Pavel Durov, but it can well do a similar thing.

        And yes, Android is a much larger heap of hay where they can hide a needle.