@return2ozma to News • edit-22 months agoCEO of UnitedHealthcare fatally shot outside of NYC hotel, source sayslockwww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square458arrow-up1872arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1864arrow-down1external-linkCEO of UnitedHealthcare fatally shot outside of NYC hotel, source sayslockwww.nbcnews.com@return2ozma to News • edit-22 months agomessage-square458file-text
Remember this? UnitedHealth uses AI model with 90% error rate to deny care, lawsuit alleges https://arstechnica.com/health/2023/11/ai-with-90-error-rate-forces-elderly-out-of-rehab-nursing-homes-suit-claims/
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•2 months agoI certainly don’t want that. But, inaction is compliance.
minus-square@FlowVoidlinkEnglish-6•2 months agoIf the IDF had not responded to 10/6 by invading Gaza, would that would likewise signal their “compliance”?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•2 months agoI think we are comparing apples to oranges. If you want to focus on US corporate corruption, I’m game.
minus-square@FlowVoidlinkEnglish-3•2 months agoCEOs die all the time, it never affects the profit-seeking of large corporations.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•2 months agoCEOs in the US are not shot down all the time.
minus-square@FlowVoidlinkEnglish-1•2 months agoWhy would UHC shareholders care about the cause of death?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•2 months agoWhy would anyone want to be the CEO of the corrupt company if those CEOs start getting killed more often for their bad behavior? If we’re just going to answer questions with more questions, we can just skip this part we will never agree.
minus-square@FlowVoidlinkEnglish-2•2 months agoLots of people are willing to take jobs with a significant risk of being shot, including drug dealers, mercenaries, and bodyguards. They usually do it for the money, and it’s usually much less money than the CEO of UHC.
I certainly don’t want that. But, inaction is compliance.
If the IDF had not responded to 10/6 by invading Gaza, would that would likewise signal their “compliance”?
I think we are comparing apples to oranges. If you want to focus on US corporate corruption, I’m game.
CEOs die all the time, it never affects the profit-seeking of large corporations.
CEOs in the US are not shot down all the time.
Why would UHC shareholders care about the cause of death?
Why would anyone want to be the CEO of the corrupt company if those CEOs start getting killed more often for their bad behavior?
If we’re just going to answer questions with more questions, we can just skip this part we will never agree.
Lots of people are willing to take jobs with a significant risk of being shot, including drug dealers, mercenaries, and bodyguards.
They usually do it for the money, and it’s usually much less money than the CEO of UHC.
You got a solution?