@return2ozma to News • edit-28 days agoCEO of UnitedHealthcare fatally shot outside of NYC hotel, source sayslockwww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square459arrow-up1872arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1865arrow-down1external-linkCEO of UnitedHealthcare fatally shot outside of NYC hotel, source sayslockwww.nbcnews.com@return2ozma to News • edit-28 days agomessage-square459file-text
Remember this? UnitedHealth uses AI model with 90% error rate to deny care, lawsuit alleges https://arstechnica.com/health/2023/11/ai-with-90-error-rate-forces-elderly-out-of-rehab-nursing-homes-suit-claims/
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•8 days agoI certainly don’t want that. But, inaction is compliance.
minus-square@FlowVoidlinkEnglish-6•8 days agoIf the IDF had not responded to 10/6 by invading Gaza, would that would likewise signal their “compliance”?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•8 days agoI think we are comparing apples to oranges. If you want to focus on US corporate corruption, I’m game.
minus-square@FlowVoidlinkEnglish-3•8 days agoCEOs die all the time, it never affects the profit-seeking of large corporations.
minus-square@FlowVoidlinkEnglish-1•8 days agoWhy would UHC shareholders care about the cause of death?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•7 days agoWhy would anyone want to be the CEO of the corrupt company if those CEOs start getting killed more often for their bad behavior? If we’re just going to answer questions with more questions, we can just skip this part we will never agree.
minus-square@FlowVoidlinkEnglish-2•7 days agoLots of people are willing to take jobs with a significant risk of being shot, including drug dealers, mercenaries, and bodyguards. They usually do it for the money, and it’s usually much less money than the CEO of UHC.
I certainly don’t want that. But, inaction is compliance.
If the IDF had not responded to 10/6 by invading Gaza, would that would likewise signal their “compliance”?
I think we are comparing apples to oranges. If you want to focus on US corporate corruption, I’m game.
CEOs die all the time, it never affects the profit-seeking of large corporations.
CEOs in the US are not shot down all the time.
Why would UHC shareholders care about the cause of death?
Why would anyone want to be the CEO of the corrupt company if those CEOs start getting killed more often for their bad behavior?
If we’re just going to answer questions with more questions, we can just skip this part we will never agree.
Lots of people are willing to take jobs with a significant risk of being shot, including drug dealers, mercenaries, and bodyguards.
They usually do it for the money, and it’s usually much less money than the CEO of UHC.
You got a solution?