• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    332 months ago

    Hydro, wind, solar, and wave/tide energy capture are not.

    The crazy part is photovoltaics are the only power source that doesn’t spin something to make electricity. Truly an outlier.

      • Schadrach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        …and the fancy steam engine version of solar is probably greener to build that photovoltaics, since it’s basically just a boiler and some mirrors.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Internal combustion engine based generators aren’t fancy steam engines either - however, they have a lot in common still. It’s still just a way to move around the spinny bits of an alternator/generator/dynamo/whatever

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Not entirely true, there is the thermoelectric generator too. Though it’s not very practical

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      There’s one more outlier though which is Electrochemical cell, like galvanic element or voltaic pile

      It was used around 1800 as a major electricity source, but I guess it quickly became uneconomical in 1866 or sth when the dynamo was invented.

      Edit: wait yes, it actually says this in the second paragraph of the linked article:

      The entire 19th-century electrical industry was powered by batteries related to Volta’s (e.g. the Daniell cell and Grove cell) until the advent of the dynamo (the electrical generator) in the 1870s.

    • @Olhonestjim
      link
      12 months ago

      Which requires them to output DC rather than AC, so they require inverters to change it to AC. It’s handier for battery storage though.