I said something along the lines of:

“Wow, I haven’t had a reason to smile ear to ear in a while.”

Along with

“Nah, the more dead corpos dragons, the better.”

In response to some liberal going off about how violence is never the solution, not mentioning how this murdered dipshit has personally overseen a system that perpetuates harm, suffering and death (violence) in the name of profit.

Good ole’ civility clause.

Whats the paradox of tolerance?

.world mods have never heard of it I guess.

  • @Maggoty
    link
    -47 days ago

    You can try to be reductive about your own ideology to be disingneous but it’s still an ideology.

    • OBJECTION!
      link
      fedilink
      37 days ago

      Well, if acknowledging objectively correct things means that you subscribe to a particular ideology, then what does that say about that ideology? 🤔

      • @Maggoty
        link
        -36 days ago

        That’s the problem though isn’t it? It’s only objectively correct to people who believe in that ideology.

        • OBJECTION!
          link
          fedilink
          16 days ago

          Is it? Which of the three things I said is not objectively correct?