Nemeski to TechnologyEnglish • edit-21 month agoOnlyFans is now accessible in Chinaedition.cnn.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up1103arrow-down19
arrow-up194arrow-down1external-linkOnlyFans is now accessible in Chinaedition.cnn.comNemeski to TechnologyEnglish • edit-21 month agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-square@NOT_RICKlinkEnglish23•1 month agolol they removed my comment for rule 3. I will never “be excellent” to a dictator. God forbid I mock an autocrat, I’m sorry jannies
minus-squareClay_pidginlinkfedilinkEnglish14•1 month agoNo head of state deserves respect ipso facto; they need to earn it. Which they rarely if ever do.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•1 month agoConsidering the OP clearly violates rule 2 I wouldn’t take it personally. haha
minus-square@NOT_RICKlinkEnglish7•edit-21 month agoI don’t agree that it doesn’t pertain to technology. Changes to the great firewall have a technology angle in addition to the political one.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-21 month agoWhat Technology based discussion can we have regarding China allowing OnlyFans in the country that does not include any aspect of the political using nothing other than what is presented in the article?
minus-square@NOT_RICKlinkEnglish4•1 month agoYou have a point. I suppose in this instance any discussion about the great firewall would verge into rule 6 territory.
lol they removed my comment for rule 3. I will never “be excellent” to a dictator. God forbid I mock an autocrat, I’m sorry jannies
No head of state deserves respect ipso facto; they need to earn it. Which they rarely if ever do.
Considering the OP clearly violates rule 2 I wouldn’t take it personally. haha
I don’t agree that it doesn’t pertain to technology. Changes to the great firewall have a technology angle in addition to the political one.
What Technology based discussion can we have regarding China allowing OnlyFans in the country that does not include any aspect of the political using nothing other than what is presented in the article?
You have a point. I suppose in this instance any discussion about the great firewall would verge into rule 6 territory.