Today, from Amtrak’s website:

  • @pyre
    link
    English
    86 days ago

    what… I know that you don’t have much in the way of public transit but… you remove what little you have now?

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      English
      126 days ago

      Oh this is nothing. Read up on the streetcars. The country basically removed most of its mass transit light rail because the car companies weren’t selling enough cars.

      They didn’t even do it in smart ways. This town just paved over the tracks. Now, 80 years later or whatever it is, the streets are caving in and they have to do all these expensive repairs.

      • @FireRetardant
        link
        English
        86 days ago

        Not only that, but most cities will claim they aren’t big enough to support a tram, despite nearly every city having trams 100 years ago

    • socsa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 days ago

      Believe it or not the US actually has one of the largest rail networks in the world still. Passenger rail is just not popular.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        While true, I would add that a big reason is that freight is prioritised by rail companies, causing large and frequent delays for passengers. Amtrak owns some of its own rail, mostly in the northeast, which is perhaps less-than-coincidentally the part of the US that has the most people taking trains.

      • @pyre
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        that’s because it’s a continent. comparing it to other countries by route km is ridiculous. if you look at coverage, or population per km it’s absolutely abysmal. the US comes 132nd per population covered. not to mention 80% of the network is freight lines. so it’s the same old: because it’s a good thing, it’s mostly there for corporations.