I.e. 100k embezzlement gets you 2.5 years

Edit.

I meant this to be the national average income (40k if I round up for cleaner math), not based on the individuals income, it’s a static formula.

Crime$$$/nat. Avg. Income = years in jail

100k/40k = 2.5 years

1mill /40k=25 years

My thoughts were, if they want to commit more crime but lessen the risk, they just need to increase the average national income. Hell, I’d throw them a bone adjust their sentences for income inflation.

Ie

Homie gets two years (80k/40k=2), but the next year average national income jumps to 80k (because it turns out actually properly threatening these fuckers actually works, who’d’ve figured?), that homies sentence gets cut to a year he gets out on time served. Call it an incentive.

Anyways, more than anything, I’m sorry my high in the shower thought got as much attention as it did.

Good night

  • @Yawweee877h444
    link
    653 months ago

    Net worth, not income.

    All net worth including stocks, property, etc.

    • @AdamEatsAss
      link
      93 months ago

      Oh no. My collection or rare mighty beans.

    • @essell
      link
      63 months ago

      Farmers getting a hard time on this policy

      • @sibannac
        link
        English
        23 months ago

        How would debt play into this? Would that be factored as a discount on the time served or increase it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        Farmers regularly drive around in multimillions worth of vehicles so they are definitely on that hook

    • @BeatTakeshi
      link
      33 months ago

      Those sweet, sweet unrealised gains