Summary

College enrollment among 18-year-old freshmen fell 5% this fall, with declines most severe at public and private non-profit four-year colleges.

Experts attribute the drop to factors including declining birth rates, high tuition costs, FAFSA delays, and uncertainty over student loan relief after Supreme Court rulings against forgiveness plans.

Economic pressures, such as the need to work, also deter students.

Despite declining enrollment, applications have risen, particularly among low- and middle-income students, underscoring interest in higher education. Experts urge addressing affordability and accessibility to reverse this trend.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -54
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Man this is the most anti capitalist way of looking at things. This is basically socialism. Not a single NA country would support this system for Europe it’s a different story tho.

    Edit: you guys are idiots I’m literally telling you why it doesn’t happen and you downvote me. In my opinion USA is a third world country as long as healthcare is a for profit business. Capitalism is akin to peasants and lords all over again which is why unions form because the working class have to force it to be fair. You are living in a society that values money more than anything and therefore you are just a number they give you one as well to define your being.

    • @DomeGuy
      link
      573 days ago

      They essentially described how the US primary education system works, and prerry much how secondary education worked until Regan.

      That you think it’s “socialism” and therefore impossible is a reinforcement of hard-right elitist propaganda.

      • @bitchkat
        link
        English
        33 days ago

        And K-12 is just an arbitrary number. Paying for college would just be extending what we already do.

    • Riskable
      link
      fedilink
      English
      173 days ago

      Think about it: What is socialism? It’s collectively funding or working on things via the government. There’s many competing definitions but that’s basically all there is to it.

      Under that definition we’re already living under socialism:

      • Fire departments
      • Police
      • Infrastructure (roads, bridges, etc)
      • Weather services
      • USPS
      • The entire military as a construct

      With socialism the people get a say in how such things are run. In private institutions they don’t. That’s the biggest realistic difference.

      Either way people are still paying for these things. If they’re not really competitive then private industry will fleece the masses because that’s what capitalism encourages (see: Healthcare). If there’s a robust, competitive market then socialism can fall behind in things like innovation and price.

      Whether or not something is funded-and-run by the government is irrelevant. What matters is the value. If government can provide a better value for a dollar than private industry it should. If the people don’t like the result they can change it or use a private alternative.

      Sure, they’ll be paying extra (on top of taxes) for the private alternative but at least it’s an option. If the government isn’t providing an alternative to private institutions then there’s really no option at all. Best anyone can do is vote with their wallet but as we can all see that just doesn’t work in certain industries (in fact, entire caregories of need!) and services.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        83 days ago

        Not to mention bank and corporate bailouts. Socialism for the rich, harsh darwinism for the poor.

      • @captainlezbian
        link
        13 days ago

        Republicans hate all of those but thr police and military

    • missingno
      link
      fedilink
      83 days ago

      You sound surprised to find out that not everyone here thinks capitalism is perfect.

    • @9point6
      link
      83 days ago

      I live in the UK, a capitalist country.

      The Scottish have this already, everyone gets free education including university, no strings. In England we only have it for people from lower economic backgrounds (via means tested grants to pay tuition), but still, we still do it for some people. It’s not a remotely absurd idea.

      Hell even most pragmatic capitalists would agree that a free-at-the-point-of-use education system is generally a good investment in the labour pool. If skilled workers are rare, they have negotiating power, and we know how much capitalists just love workers that are able to negotiate from a position of power.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      33 days ago

      I love it when people participate in the Overton window right-wing ratchet and think they’re just being pragmatic.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 days ago

      I didn’t even know this site had enough people to downvote someone this much this quickly. You’re breaking ground with your idiocy. 👏🎉