cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/22907187

Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky revealed that 43,000 Ukrainian soldiers have died and 370,000 have been injured since Russia’s invasion began, marking a rare admission of the conflict’s toll.

He also claimed 198,000 Russian soldiers have been killed, though casualty figures from both sides remain unverified.

The update comes amid heightened fighting, with Russia suffering record monthly casualties in November.

Talks with French President Macron and U.S. Trump focused on a potential peace deal, with Zelensky emphasizing the need for international guarantees to secure lasting peace against Russian aggression.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -121 month ago

    If more people defaulted to always ask “qui bono” when these things happen, manufacturing consent would be much harder.

    Russian economy is in shambles, Ukraine itself is in shambles, the EU is in shambles. Meanwhile, the US averted a gigantic crash when the insane investments in fracking would yield 0 returns plunging the entire economy in a recessive spiral. Luckily, somehow, the price of US fracked gas is now competitive in Europe, and the biggest EU hawks for war, Poland, just so happened to have the most convenient LPG terminal in the north right on time to transit US gas into Europe. I just wish the yanks and the orks would commit to fight in alaska amongst themselves and leave the rest of the world in peace. Grow a pair, fight elsewhere.

    • redfellow
      link
      fedilink
      121 month ago

      I’m Finnish and haven’t seen this “EU in the shambles” you speak of. It’s as if you are repeating some silly propaganda.

        • @FlowVoid
          link
          English
          71 month ago

          Weaker than expected growth is not an “economy in shambles”.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -2
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Of course you default to ad hominem.

                I can simplify the reasoning, maybe it helps. I should be more inclusive in my writing, it was a bit ableist.

                Growth is stumbling because, within a range, lack of competitive energy prices, decrease in industrial output, inflationary pressure and of course, diversion of money from investment and stability into a proxy war effort. That has lead to instability in the heart of the EU, the two countries that usually represent the leadership of the bloc, France and Germany. This has left the cohesion of the EU severely limited with foreign actors adding to the instability. Denmark, the baltics and Poland are basically running interference for the US (and profiting from that), Hungary, Slovakia and Austria are running interference for Russia (and profiting from that) and the rest of the countries have yet to show a unified vision that transpires from a lack of leadership. To make matters worse, Macron continued veto of the iberian pipeline junction up to Germany has created friction at the core of Europe. (That’s before even mentioning the findings of the Ombudsman on transparency and lack of accountability)

                Now, of course you’re going to not even read a line of the comment because you’re likely interested in black and white stories. Sadly, the EU is in shambles and the discussions we should be having to restructure and increase competitiveness are not happening because we’re too busy trying to breathe with Russian and US boots stomping on our neck.

                • redfellow
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  This is what I replied to, pre-edit:

                  Moving the goalposts won’t work. You said shambles and there is nothing supporting your false statement.

                  As for your edit, you are attemping still to justify using a completely faulty statement by regurgitating things that prove other statements, ironically, absent in the post that kicked off people calling you out.

                  Total disorder in the EU is not a fact.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -11 month ago

                    “I can simplify the reasoning, maybe it helps. I should be more inclusive in my writing, it was a bit ableist.”

                    That should have been enough to justify it to anyone arguing in good faith.

                    It is in shambles, if you choose to ignore it that’s on you. It’s not a faulty statement, it’s actual fact.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 month ago

      If the US is behind all of this, why does Putin keep playing straight into the US hands and destroying Russia?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -4
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I thought Putin got to choose the President of the US… Twice. It does make one wonder why he didn’t large scale invade after spending so much money to get the cheeto and Moscow Mitch to have so much power? 🤔

        He chose precisely when NATO was rebounding from the cheeto and the biggest pro Ukraine executive (Ah Vikkie Nuland) was in power. Sounds perfectly reasonable and makes much more sense than what Mearsheimer or Sachs or Sakwa, ya know, people who actually know their shit, have been warning about for more than a decade…

        Chomsky spent a lifetime trying to educate people, it’s sad he failed so resoundingly.

    • @NOT_RICK
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      and the biggest EU hawks for war, Poland

      Yup, definitely their gas terminal and not their geographical proximity to Russia, a nation that has repeatedly subjugated them. Get a fucking grip.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -41 month ago

        So conflicts from almost a century ago are game. That’s cool. Where shall we start? Panama, Colombia, Bolivia, Venezuela, Cuba, and of course, la piéce de resistance, Chile. So, by that logic, Mexico should enter a military alliance with Russia or China. I wonder if that Monroe doctrine would shine in that case.

        • @FlowVoid
          link
          English
          51 month ago

          Panama, Colombia, Bolivia, Venezuela, Cuba

          Of those, American troops only invaded Panama.

          Meanwhile, Russian troops invaded not only Poland but Finland, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, Hungary, Czechoslovakia…

        • @NOT_RICK
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          First off, Poland was a client state of Russia in living memory. Secondly, as an independent nation, it would be Mexico’s right to enter into a defensive alliance with whomever they want. Thankfully Russia is a piss-poor ally (see Armenia, Syria), so I don’t see that becoming an issue any time soon. Maybe China, one day.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -31 month ago

            Funny, I remember the Chilean coup 🤔 Meanwhile we’re all looking for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq… And just yesterday the government of Syria was toppled.

            • @NOT_RICK
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              The Iraq war was illegal and Nixon was a shit head who deserved to rot in prison for a myriad of reasons, his support of the Chilean coup included. If you want to go to bat for a piece of shit war criminal like Assad be my guest.