• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 months ago

    My reply would be: “if the law is just, I will make a decision that serves justice”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      662 months ago

      And they would respond “You are excused, with our thanks”.

      Don’t get creative. The only correct answer is “no”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        I had half a day to think about it when they were selecting jury for a DUI case. I’d rather speak my mind freely for the jurors they’ve already selected, who are present during the full selection process. Normally one might think context doesn’t matter but DUI laws can also apply to a bicycle, which is a perfect candidate for being nullified by the jury.

        • @Duamerthrax
          link
          English
          112 months ago

          You can speak freely with the other jurors during deliberation.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 months ago

            Yeah but I also didn’t really want to be on the jury that much. And I didn’t get called up anyway.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 months ago

                My approach also plants the seed of reason in the jurors who have already been selected. They may ignore jury nullification, but an open discussion of whether or not just laws need to be enforced never hurts.