• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    232 days ago

    To all the people who say he’s just a suspect, unfortunately they have good evidence against him, our only hope now is a jury of our peers.

    • granolabar
      link
      fedilink
      152 days ago

      okay…

      the second one with a comment could be any fedi commenter… people use word parasite here every other comment lol

        • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
          link
          English
          22 days ago

          0% chance of that happening. I don’t live in NY, and I’m willing to bet they’re gonna go extra tough on weeding out people even slightly knowledgeable about jury nullification.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            That’s not the type of info that someone would necessarily volunteer unless they had no intnention of using it. The beautiful thing about it is that even if a person perjured themself about knowing of jury nullification, the one time they’d realisticly make use of it couldn’t actually be used as evidence/testimony against them.

            -They may weed out the young and educated, though.

      • @Pilferjinx
        link
        62 days ago

        Isn’t the picture not even confirmed to be the shooter? So comparing a sus picture to a suspect seems like it’s getting pretty far removed.

    • Queen HawlSera
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 days ago

      Bro the photo they have and the guy in the car aren’t even the same skintone… also we censor the word “gun” in News ARticles now? I fucking hate you Youtube.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 days ago

        That’s easy enough to explain. The camera white balance might not have been the same, not to mention they might have been saved with different color profiles.