• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    472 days ago

    Don’t be disappointed. I guessed he was going to do this, and for good reason. His options were to either, live a life in fear, worrying that one day he would be caught, or, to basically give him self up, and elect for a Jury trial. Jury nullification is one os the most powerful tools available to the average, non-rich american. If he goes through the trial and gets acquited (which only takes 1 juror), then hes a free man, a folk hero, and he sets the precident that killing rich murderers isn’t an automatic crime.

    What he’s doing is the smartest available option, please donate to his legal defense fund.

    • @AdrianTheFrog
      link
      English
      823 hours ago

      a court case also draws out media coverage, possibly more than an extended search would

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      271 day ago

      and gets acquited (which only takes 1 juror)

      Unfortunately this is not true. 1 juror alone can hang the jury, but they’d have to convince all the other jurors to actually render a verdict of not guilty to avoid a mistrial

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 hours ago

        Have you ever been on a jury? In my experience it’s 2-4 strong personalities and a bunch of people confused by lawyer speak (because two confident authority figures are telling them to believe e two different things and they can’t reconcile the contradiction) and people who just want to go home and thus go along with the strong personalities.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 hours ago

          Isn’t it always said that jurys are made up of people not smart enough to get out of jury duty.