• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 days ago

    Hopefully he’s still around and you can ask him about the relative image quality between those formats. If he was interested in quality, he wasn’t going to grab the disc camera. It wasn’t like Betamax where it was superior but lost a battle in the marketplace. Disc film was objectively much worse than even 110 while being much more expensive to buy and process.

    • Ben Hur Horse Race
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 day ago

      I understand the difference in quality between a 120mm neg and a 10mm neg, especially considering the lens was a shitty little piece of plastic a centimeter from the media.

      he’s not around any longer. my point was that it wasn’t for dumb people who didn’t know any better, it was a novel film format that a lot of people bought because it was different and interesting.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        it wasn’t for dumb people who didn’t know any better

        I mean, it kind of was though, wasn’t it?

        Just because more knowledgeable people found it interesting and got it for the novelty or to see how it worked doesn’t mean it wasn’t a product intended for people who, Kodak hoped, wouldn’t know any better. That doesn’t mean I’m saying your father didn’t know better.

        • Ben Hur Horse Race
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 day ago

          yeah fair enough.

          I actually got a bit nostalgic and interesred due to this post and read the wikipedia article about them, and supposedly the prints were supposed to ne made with this six lens process but few labs got the equipment needed, and continued to develop the film with standard three lens systems, so the photos came out with half the quality the producers intended