minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish22•1 month agoNot what I said at all. Try again. This is about the common republican whataboutism, and clarifying that no political party is above scrutiny.
minus-square@gruelinkEnglish29•1 month agoI read his comment as also being addressed to the Republicans in the back: a concurrence, not a rebuttal.
minus-squareJackbyDevlinkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-21 month agoSo many people online take replies as contradictions when they’re meant to be support. It’s frustrating.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•1 month agoLet’s not get this twisted, there are likely zero Republicans on lemmy, and if there are, they can only be counted on one hand.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•1 month agoHeh there are conservative comms, they are bizarre.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-8•1 month agoBuddy, if it sounds like a duck and waddles for bread, I’m calling it a duck.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•1 month agoWell, it didn’t sound like a duck. You just have problems comprehending what you read.
Not what I said at all. Try again.
This is about the common republican whataboutism, and clarifying that no political party is above scrutiny.
I read his comment as also being addressed to the Republicans in the back: a concurrence, not a rebuttal.
So many people online take replies as contradictions when they’re meant to be support. It’s frustrating.
Let’s not get this twisted, there are likely zero Republicans on lemmy, and if there are, they can only be counted on one hand.
Heh there are conservative comms, they are bizarre.
Buddy, if it sounds like a duck and waddles for bread, I’m calling it a duck.
Well, it didn’t sound like a duck. You just have problems comprehending what you read.