• [email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    IMO this is why it takes an additional axis to define a government, not just left/right but also free/authoritarian. You can find examples of all combinations. Left wing and repressive? Cuba. Left leaning and free? Sweden. Right wing and repressive? Russia, Saudi Arabia, whatever. Right leaning and free (mostly)? USA.

    Obviously, there’s a gradient within these axes, but it’s strange to see people cheering on a country that matches their preferred left or right wing ideology if they’re super repressive.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 hour ago

      I think Saudi Arabia is the perfect example of why even that model isn’t even enough. I mean sure they are a monarchy and quite self-focused but not really in a nationalistic way. To be fair I don’t know much about their domestic politics. To put them into the same corner as Russia, eh dunno.

      • OBJECTION!
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I couldn’t ask for clearer evidence than not accepting Saudi Arabia as authoritarian to demonstrate that “free vs authoritarian” are just propaganda terms and that how “free” a country allegedly is is really just a function of how aligned it is with the US.

        In what universe is Saudi Arabia more free than Cuba?

    • @GrammarPolice
      link
      34 hours ago

      This is why we need to reeducate people and stop using the traditional left-right spectrum and start using the axis spectrum