• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      117 hours ago

      The CEO is however a robber baron operating at the times of peace, using different methods but achieving the same end - people dying, most often miserably. I don’t see how that’s better.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -76 hours ago

        This is why I get tired of Lemmy. Constant extreme views with little rational thought

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          55 hours ago

          I’m sorry, but I don’t think it’s so radical not grieving after a person who is the head of a corporation of which sole purpose is to take money from people for a promise of payout when things go dire, and then refusing when the times comes, leaving them exposed at the most miserable time of their entire lives…

          Insurance companies are not banks, they don’t take deposits and return them to you with huge margin when you need it most. They would be operating at massive loss for each client.

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -44 hours ago

            You don’t have to grieve but think you should to sensitive to fellow humans no matter if they run a company that ruins your life.

    • @zergtoshi
      link
      English
      37 hours ago

      Right, but still a person who had a part in making the lives of lots of people miserable or unnecessarily short.
      If a CEO isn’t responsible for the policies of the company they’re CEO of, why would you need a CEO in the first place?