@[email protected]M to Public [email protected]English • 1 month agoSometimes it feels like folks in US would build anything but efficient transit 🤦slrpnk.netimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1135arrow-down110cross-posted to: fuckcars
arrow-up1125arrow-down1imageSometimes it feels like folks in US would build anything but efficient transit 🤦slrpnk.net@[email protected]M to Public [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square36fedilinkcross-posted to: fuckcars
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-21 month agoShort-distance city trains used to have multiple compartments too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swing_Door_(train) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harris_(train)
minus-square@[email protected]OPMlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoI assumed the parent commenter meant this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartment_coach But if the commenter meant cross-seat trains like this: then yeah it exists
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 month agoYes… it’s the first one? Did you not look at the links I shared?
minus-square🇨🇦🇩🇪🇨🇳张殿李🇨🇳🇩🇪🇨🇦linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoThings like the “C-Trains” in Calgary, despite being intended for mass transit (and ridden mainly by the poors) are also multi-compartment.
Short-distance city trains used to have multiple compartments too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swing_Door_(train) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harris_(train)
I assumed the parent commenter meant this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartment_coach
But if the commenter meant cross-seat trains like this:
then yeah it exists
Yes… it’s the first one? Did you not look at the links I shared?
Things like the “C-Trains” in Calgary, despite being intended for mass transit (and ridden mainly by the poors) are also multi-compartment.