Track_Shovel to Lemmy ShitpostEnglish • 4 days agoLooking for answersslrpnk.netimagemessage-square146fedilinkarrow-up11.74Karrow-down118
arrow-up11.72Karrow-down1imageLooking for answersslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel to Lemmy ShitpostEnglish • 4 days agomessage-square146fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink18•4 days agoPacifism is only good for aggressors and cowards
minus-squarego $fsck yourselflinkEnglish10•4 days agoNon-violence != Pacifism A person can be an advocate for non-violence and not be a pacifist. No need to conflate the two, particularly when people have so much hate and vitriol for any perceived pacifism.
minus-square@raspberriesareyummylink3•4 days agoArguably, accepting the necessity of occasional violent protest is more reasonable than giving up pacifism.
Pacifism is only good for aggressors and cowards
Non-violence != Pacifism
A person can be an advocate for non-violence and not be a pacifist. No need to conflate the two, particularly when people have so much hate and vitriol for any perceived pacifism.
Arguably, accepting the necessity of occasional violent protest is more reasonable than giving up pacifism.