@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-21 month agoWhat is the lowest score you have achieved on EFF Cover Your Tracks?sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1168arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1168arrow-down1imageWhat is the lowest score you have achieved on EFF Cover Your Tracks?sh.itjust.works@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-21 month agomessage-square67fedilinkfile-text
On Librewolf i got 16.48 bits of information, on TOR browser 10.32 bits, but on Tails I managed to get only 9.3 bits. https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoIf I tried twice and I got a unique id both times, does it mean Firefox is covering my track ?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 month agoif it ran the test again, I’d say yes. but if it just reloads the result page, doesn’t mean anything
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoyeah I was wondering if the tool would show that hit saws this id once already
minus-square@astropenguin5link1•1 month agoIdk, but I have the same. Scrolling through the tracking methods the only ones with high uniqueness were hash of canvas fingerprint and hash of webGL for me. According to it I still have strong protection Firefox + ublock on mobile though
If I tried twice and I got a unique id both times, does it mean Firefox is covering my track ?
if it ran the test again, I’d say yes. but if it just reloads the result page, doesn’t mean anything
yeah I was wondering if the tool would show that hit saws this id once already
Idk, but I have the same. Scrolling through the tracking methods the only ones with high uniqueness were hash of canvas fingerprint and hash of webGL for me. According to it I still have strong protection Firefox + ublock on mobile though