• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 days ago

    That’s side effects, the difference is irrelevant anyway.

    I insist because I think it’s important to understand this, both for you and for people reading these comments. The whole point of fingerprinting is to be able to track users without relying on cookies or IP. Changing IP does not protect against fingerprinting. I don’t want people to be mislead by your comment and think they are going to avoid tracking by just taking a better VPN.

    You can read more here:

    https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/about#browser-fingerprinting

    “Browser fingerprinting” is a method of tracking web browsers by the configuration and settings information they make visible to websites, rather than traditional tracking methods such as IP addresses and unique cookies.

    And you can check the source code to see there is no mention of IP address:

    https://github.com/EFForg/cover-your-tracks/blob/master/fingerprint/fingerprint_helper.py

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        It’s not worthless but it’s on only an indication, an example.

        Isn’t the score change similar to the one you have when toggling Apple safebrowsing? (whatever that is)

        A probable explanation is that your VPN client is somehow changing some of your browser settings. The VPN client, not the VPN itself.

        Just check the detailed results to see what’s changed between the two. Whatever it is it could be changed manually, it’s does not require a VPN to change. But you probably don’t want to change it because your score with a VPN is worse than without.

        But this has nothing to do with a VPN being the best or the worse.