• ddh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      521 day ago

      Damn I’m happy I don’t rely on CUDA or DLSS

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        421 hours ago

        Neither of them are as good, especially if you factor in raytracing. DLSS Ray Reconstruction is basically required to not have a noisy image with RTX.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          220 hours ago

          Ray tracing*

          RTX is a brand.

          Regardless, given the performance impact and how few games actually have ray tracing (implemented correctly), it makes more sense to just disregard ray tracing altoghether.

          It’s an undercooked technology used to push more expensive products, nothing more.

          Regarding dlss vs fsr and xess, yes dlss has better quality but it’s also proprietary so I honestly do not care about it. Just like gsync died, dlss will eventually die as well.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            119 hours ago

            Just like gsync died

            (true) gsync isn’t dead, it’s only in the highest end of monitors which is basically where it’s always been. It only “died” because it requires an expensive module vs adaptive sync being built into basically every modern display controller so it’s basically free.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              119 hours ago

              The proprietary gsync approach with a dedicated hw module is indeed dead and most “g-sync” monitors just use the now pretty common vesa’s vrr (aka freesync).

              However I did research a bit and found some “gsync pulsar” monitors but none have been released yet, I believe. They do sound like unnecessary overpriced products though. That’s Nvidia for ya.

      • @Xenny
        link
        English
        022 hours ago

        Use none of them. Embrace funny duck