You claim to not be talking about AGI and then you immediately go on talking about Data from Star Trek as your example of a nonhuman intelligence. Clearly Data is AGI.
Nothing we have is anywhere near Data. It doesn’t even have the potential to resemble the smallest aspects of Data.
Personally I have never seen an AI that even gets close to intelligence. A baby cat is infinitely more intelligent. I have no problem with accepting nonhuman intelligence that’s not the issue here.
You need reasoning on novel problems to be intelligent not just rewording text from the internet.
What did you think of paragraph 9 in My article?
You claim to not be talking about AGI and then you immediately go on talking about Data from Star Trek as your example of a nonhuman intelligence. Clearly Data is AGI.
Nothing we have is anywhere near Data. It doesn’t even have the potential to resemble the smallest aspects of Data.
Personally I have never seen an AI that even gets close to intelligence. A baby cat is infinitely more intelligent. I have no problem with accepting nonhuman intelligence that’s not the issue here.
You need reasoning on novel problems to be intelligent not just rewording text from the internet.
That’s not what paragraph 9 is about.