• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      My answer is that we have to work with the best evidence available because informed decisions lead to better outcomes…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          Making a decision based on the best evidence available… I feel like I’m repeating myself. Oh, I see. You’re trolling.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Is everyone who challenges your ideas a troll? Sorry. I’m still not trolling you OR arguing just to argue.

            And let’s talk about the best decisions. Did Vlad The Impaler think it was the best decision? What about Ghengis Khan? Kubla Khan? Nobunaga Oda? Mitsuhede? Washington? King George? The list goes on and on… So who’s right, and who’s wrong?

            They all had the best evidence available, yet thought that the best way was to oppose a different idea

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 month ago

                    All the time, but every aspect should be considered. For example, there was one commenter in this chain that mentioned the potential of bacterium on Mars. If they exist and we land on Mars then we inadvertently impact said bacterium and potentially impact Mars on a scale that we can’t comprehend or at the very least understand. Is that right or wrong?