• 18-24-61-B-17-17-4OP
      link
      English
      131 month ago

      I mean, yeah, thing’s gonna be more redaction than words most likely. Sucks but I’m still holding out hope.

    • @shalafi
      link
      English
      51 month ago

      Don’t know why it would be redacted as there shouldn’t be any national security info. Maybe sources and methods?

      • @Eldritch
        link
        English
        81 month ago

        Protecting victims at least.

        • @shalafi
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          The one victim, that we know of, initially refused to testify. Prosecution didn’t want her anyway because she quickly turned 18 and started an OnlyFans site. Sucks, but you can see how that would prejudice a jury.

          That and his dirtbag friend not flipping him was why the case was thrown out. Again, sucks, but fair enough if no witnesses will speak.

          She has since been on official record about all this. And it’s public. (Might be wrong on that last part.)