Ragdoll X to Science [email protected]English • edit-219 hours agoI predict that this post will get approximately 01000011100101100000000000000000 upvotesimagemessage-square32arrow-up1604arrow-down122
arrow-up1582arrow-down1imageI predict that this post will get approximately 01000011100101100000000000000000 upvotesRagdoll X to Science [email protected]English • edit-219 hours agomessage-square32
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-211 hours ago1 is always 1. It’s 1 × b⁰ where b is the base. Anything raised to the zeroth power is 1. 10 is the base. 1 × b¹ + 0 × b⁰
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•edit-218 hours agoThat doesn’t make it rational but simply makes it writable in 2 digits(10) Also you should have 3.1415… “number of characters” in that base… The base becoming irrational will make the number irrational
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•23 hours agoWriting the same number a different way does not make it rational. There are no two natural numbers p and q so that p/q = 1 base pi.
minus-square@very_well_lostlinkEnglish4•22 hours agoEven in base π, π is still considered an irrational number; using an irrational based doesn’t change the fundamental identity of whole numbers or irrational numbers, it just changes the way we write them.
What? That’s not true at all…
Base π: π=1
1 is always 1. It’s 1 × b⁰ where b is the base. Anything raised to the zeroth power is 1.
10 is the base. 1 × b¹ + 0 × b⁰
That doesn’t make it rational but simply makes it writable in 2 digits(10)
Also you should have 3.1415… “number of characters” in that base… The base becoming irrational will make the number irrational
Writing the same number a different way does not make it rational. There are no two natural numbers p and q so that p/q = 1 base pi.
π = 10
in base 10, 10 = 10.
Even in base π, π is still considered an irrational number; using an irrational based doesn’t change the fundamental identity of whole numbers or irrational numbers, it just changes the way we write them.