• @joel1974
    link
    1331 month ago

    Why is it terrorism when rich people are killed?

    • @MehBlah
      link
      English
      111 month ago

      Cause they only care when rich scum are terrorized.

    • @ynthrepic
      link
      5
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Terrorism is supposed to be the dogmatic or ideologically motivated killing of civilians, often by those who are willing to die in the process. It’s terror inducing because it could seemingly happen anywhere at any time to any one, and it’s a lot easier to cause harm to others when you’re suicidal and not trying to get away with it.

      Of course, that’s not how it’s routinely used, or perhaps was ever really used by anyone except academics.

      • NoSpiritAnimal
        link
        521 month ago

        The NY charge calls for a specific action taken against a government entity.

        Unless UHC is part of the government, but corporations as government is Musolini style fascism, and the US isn’t a fascist country, right?

      • @mynameisigglepiggle
        link
        401 month ago

        But is it politically motivated?

        He was pissed his claim was denied.

        • Deme
          link
          fedilink
          18
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I’d say that yes it was definitely at least partially politically motivated, since it was just as much an attack against the system as it was against the person, but hardly terrorism since there was no intent to scare the general public.

          • @chiliedogg
            link
            101 month ago

            He probably did intend to scare insurance company executives. I can see calling it terrorism, even if I think he should get off.

            I’ve dealt with back pain, and during the height of my battle with the insurer I absolutely would’ve been tempted to kill the fuckers given the chance.

            • granolabar
              link
              fedilink
              41 month ago

              insurance company executives

              Yes but they are not civilians, the are enemy combatants so it is fair game.

              Also Luigi if he did it, literally spared witness who is in fact a civilians.

              Terrorism charge will hopefully back fire.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil
          link
          English
          13
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          So, I’ve heard he didn’t actually have UHC. There’s also no confirmation of a denied claim, just the fact that he had back pain. Luigi targeted Brian because UHC was the largest insurance provider in the country, not because he was personally denied a particular claim. The guy was doing long distance hiking and running months before the slaying.

          TrueAnon podcast has a great deep dive into who Luigi was and what his potential motives were.

          He’s got a background in Effective Altruism, he got into the Dark Enlightenment movement, and was involved with a number of Silicon Valley gurus with particularly extremist ideology.

          Far from simply being an unhappy customer, it’s likely he’s a real life “Radical Centrist” who got pilled on far center neoliberal ideology.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            17
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            ….so? How many killers before him have written a manifesto? Are all these school shooters, attacking actual public schools, being charged with terrorism? They’re actually striking out at “the system.” How many white supremacists mass shootings have written manifestos and not been charged with terrorism?

            • @UnderpantsWeevil
              link
              English
              21 month ago

              Are all these school shooters, attacking actual public schools, being charged with terrorism?

              There’s little need to up-charge school shooters. Many of them are killed on sight. Those that are captured (Dylan Roof, for instance) get life without parole or the death sentence.

              But in NYC, a single murder without a terrorist motive only gets you to 2nd Degree Murder. That means you’ll be out in 15 years. The “terrorism” addendum is necessary for life without parole sentencing.

              • @captainlezbian
                link
                81 month ago

                Yes, but the charges should fit the crime not be selected to ensure the desired outcome

                • @UnderpantsWeevil
                  link
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  There is no objective measure of criminal conduct. It’s all malleable. Prosecutors and judges and juries ultimately make these decisions case-by-case. And the results can be heavily weighted by wealthy, socially influential private interests who want to see an example made of a particularly offensive or terrifying individual.

                  • Justin
                    link
                    fedilink
                    21 month ago

                    There is no objective measure of criminal conduct

                    I mean that’s what the law is supposed to do, maybe it doesn’t work like that in the US.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 month ago

        Is the second guy who tried to shoot trump being charged with terrorism? Because that was politically motivated.

        If he’s not, Luigi also does not deserve the charge.