Things didn’t end well for the last guy…

  • Flying SquidOP
    link
    English
    0
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Not getting paid on time when you live paycheck-to-paycheck is not “inconvenience.” You must live quite the privileged life to think so.

    No, I’m trying to get you to accept calling inconvenience slavery is a bit too far.

    By needling me for not mentioning it in the last two comments? Try in a different and better way.

    • @Madison420
      link
      English
      14 hours ago

      I hate to tell you, that’s an inconvenience not literal slavery.

      You must live a privileged life to compare forced servitude and plays at genetic inferiority to not getting paid.

      Yes.

      Try in a different and better way.

      I don’t need to, you’re still defending your point which is that not getting paid is literally slavery.

      Check yourself, no one is selling their children nor themselves down river. Like how is the fact it is objectively offensive to compare the two not altogether glaring to you?

      • Flying SquidOP
        link
        English
        03 hours ago

        Again, living paycheck-to-paycheck and then not getting paid is not an inconvenience. How do you not know that?

        It’s a way to get your house foreclosed on and a way to have to decide between electricity and food.

        Have you really never been in that sort of financial situation?

          • Flying SquidOP
            link
            English
            03 hours ago

            That’s all that matters to you, I guess. As long as it isn’t literally the exact same thing as people in chains picking cotton in the fields, it’s just fine and it doesn’t matter who suffers. So fine. It isn’t literal slavery. It’s just incredibly cruel, especially to children who did nothing to deserve it.

            Happy?

            • @Madison420
              link
              English
              12 hours ago

              It’s not at all the same thing since it’s not forcible.

              it’s just fine and it doesn’t matter who suffers.

              Point to where I said or implied anything of the sort.

              It’s just incredibly cruel, especially to children who did nothing to deserve it.

              Agreed, but things don’t need to be slavery to be shitty and the offensive hyperbole is both unnecessary and misleading.

              Happy?

              Yeah, though the indignation is curious.

              • Flying SquidOP
                link
                English
                02 hours ago

                Well considering all of this turned out to be you being nitpicky when the point was to illustrate how cruel something you decided was merely an inconvenience was, yeah, I’m pretty indignant. Especially since now it’s suddenly not just inconvenient but cruel.

                Make up your mind.

                • @Madison420
                  link
                  English
                  12 hours ago

                  Inconveniences can be cruel boss, they’re not however slavery no matter how dramatic and indignate you choose to be.

                  You’re implying being owned and not being paid are analogous, they’re not.

                  No one owns your children, no one is going to whip you, you need not but your freedom if that’s even a possibility, you’re not in fact less than anyone else in a legal sense of personhood.

                  It’s not productive to be so hyperbolic especially when what you’re saying is incredibly offensive let alone to be indignate when someone tries to explain to you how downright cruel and insensitive you’re being.

                  • Flying SquidOP
                    link
                    English
                    11 hour ago

                    For fuck’s sake, having your house foreclosed on isn’t an inconvenience.

                    And that’s what happens if you’re behind on house payments and you aren’t getting paid.

                    Seriously, how rich are you?