UAB research has characterized in detail how polymer-based commercial tea bags release millions of nanoplastics and microplastics when infused. The study shows for the first time the capacity of these particles to be absorbed by human intestinal cells, and are thus able to reach the bloodstream and spread throughout the body.
Is there a way to tell whether teabags use these materials? It’s not really something listed in the ingredients
Linked Source here. Sample 3 is a round teabag which is a distinct feature of Tetley tea. Although I’m sure other brands may use that design too.
I have bad news: even “non-plastic” tea bags have plastic fibres woven into the paper/cloth. These fibres allow the material to be sealed with heat. Best to use loose leaf and a strainer.
I drink Barry’s which say they are 100% plastic free and biodegradable, but now I wonder how to find out if that is true.
So my tea bags that have a little staple to keep it together might be okay?
Edit: The other kind I have is the top folded over and the string tied through it, but no staple.
Source? For example the clipper website says they don’t use plastic, how do you know it still has plastic? https://www.clipper-teas.com/tea-talk/plastic-free-tea-bags/
Read that link carefully, there’s a lot of flowery language but they do not say their bags are plastic-free.
National institute of health: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10389239/ If a company makes a claim that their bags are 100% plastic free, that is great. Just don’t assume that paper bag = no plastic.
By the way: the clipper website says they use PLA, which is a plastic - just not a petroleum plastic. Its health effects are being investigated.
There is also this page that says which tea brand don’t use plastics with sources to the announcement.
Unless they were talking about PLA plastics which from a (very) quick search seems to pose no risk
This is the summary blurb at the top of the article.
I would be very skeptical of ingesting something and believing it harmless if the study finds that it eventually breaks down in the environment, let alone it’s clearly funded by a company with ‘bioplastics’ in the company name.
I have more bad news: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724007307](Are bioplastics safe? Hazardous effects of polylactic acid (PLA) nanoplastics in Drosophila)
Fixed the link for anyone who wanted to skim this study
Your study is from 1/4/24 the one I linked is from 26/6/24
Or am I just being a muppet here?
Silly me. Glad that is resolved.