• @bitwaba
    link
    2511 hours ago

    My parents said the same thing about air pollution and carbon emissions

    • socsa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1110 hours ago

      I suppose the difference is that a country doesn’t just get conquered by force if it stops polluting.

    • @finitebanjo
      link
      5
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Almost all pollution is by industries and not your parents, so…

      If anything you could criticize them if they voted to keep the pollution going.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        17 hours ago

        Buying a big SUV, shopping at h&m, eating red meat multiple times a week, and flying to the other side of the world during summer, are all worse than voting for climate change. Companies don’t pollute for the sake of it.

        • @finitebanjo
          link
          4
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Check out the EPA’s stats on ghg emissions at this LINK. 28% of emissions total are from non-agriculture/shipping transportation, and if you break that down then 57% of the 28% are light duty vehicles, all larger road vehicles are 23%, and aircraft are 9%.

          Since 2005 emissions carbon-equivalent total of the USA has fallen about a billion metric tons thanks to awareness and federal programs to reduce and eliminate emissions, almost exclusively in the Electrical Power sector.

          So even if you cut out all consumer non-business transport you’re left with 72% of emissions. A person who votes to curttail polution does more good than a person who drives a hybrid.

          • BigAssFan
            link
            24 hours ago

            Hybrids don’t reduce CO2 emissions that much anyway. Better to go all electric and vote for climate protection.

    • stebo
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      yeah this is a really stupid argument

      “It’s not like Israël is gonna stop killing Palestinians if I refuse to kill Palestinians”