• @Serinus
    link
    -2019 days ago

    his children are better off without him.

    That’s certainly not true. You don’t have to dehumanize someone you see as your enemy.

    I recently watched 1917, and ::: spoiler spoilers I’m proud of the way the plane was handled. One can see the necessity of war without dehumanizing the other side. :::

    I’m sorry for his kids. I’m sorry for his family. I can continue to hope for a better way.

    We’ve been through this history enough times. I, for one, would rather not repeat it. If this is the way things are gonna go, it’s going to get a hell of a lot worse before it gets better.

    • @BassTurd
      link
      3219 days ago

      It depends. It appears he wasn’t really in the picture and has a history of being a piece of shit. Who’s to say that his kids aren’t better off without him, and honestly, probably heavily enriched by his demise?

      Losing a father isn’t always a bad thing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3019 days ago

      Dude had no qualms about dehumanizing the people he stole money from and didn’t give life saving treatment to. Just because he could do it from the cover of corporate mandates doesn’t make it any less evil.

    • skulblaka
      link
      fedilink
      318 days ago

      That’s certainly not true.

      That’s certainly not something you can determine with the knowledge we have. Many children are, or would be, better off without their shitbag parent. God knows I would have been.

      • @Serinus
        link
        118 days ago

        It’s pretty horrible to say, either way.

        • @whalebiologist
          link
          117 days ago

          then don’t comment on it, just sit silently in your home and be appalled, you’re just validating your own morality to no ones benefit.