• @TrickDacy
    link
    17 hours ago

    Lol it’s obviously disingenuous to even say Linux was marketed at all. But being disingenuous is your thing so it makes sense

    • MudMan
      link
      fedilink
      06 hours ago

      It was marketed. Like I said above, I remember the Ubuntu launch being kind of a big deal and having a bit of messaging muscle behind it. I also have branded Red Hat install CDs in storage that seem to have been some sort of sponsorship or collab, which is a nice historical artifact. One kinda like this.

      And then there were dedicated hobby magazines and sections in computing magazines and stuff like that. Most weren’t necessarily affiliated to any one company, but it was a thing you’d see in a magazine rack every now and then.

      Obviously nothing on the level of the commercial, paid OS, but there have been multiple times where companies built around Linux did do some concerted promotion.

      • @TrickDacy
        link
        149 minutes ago

        It is likely a fact that the majority of middle aged computer users have never even heard of Linux, but sure. Because redhat spent a few dollars a year on marketing, that’s definitely an apt comparison. Lmfao, disingenuous is the only word for you.

        • MudMan
          link
          fedilink
          140 minutes ago

          Look, you can try to reframe what I’m saying into entirely different arguments in your head as much as you want, but as you kept saying reading the previous posts is easy.

          I’d be curious to see that poll, though. I’m liking my chances with millenials, honestly.

          Just so I’m clear, here, your working hypothesis is that Linux isn’t more popular because people don’t know that it exists? Is that the idea? Like, if you ran ads for it on Youtube or something it’d skyrocket in usage?

          • @TrickDacy
            link
            135 minutes ago

            You’re not very good at trolling. Maybe you could try something else now?