• Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    81 day ago

    Would not make anything a state. Have you seen Puerto Rico? Guam? American Samoa?

    • HubertManne
      link
      fedilink
      21 day ago

      puerto rico is not a state because every time the opportunity arose they voted not to be one. guam and american samoa im not really sure whats going on.

        • HubertManne
          link
          fedilink
          -31 day ago

          oh common. do you think thats a legitamate example. it was carved out of maryland and virginia for the specific purpose of being the capital with no state having authority over it.

          • @NightwingdragonOP
            link
            English
            723 hours ago

            But I believe (correct me if I’m wrong, please) that it was also not meant to have a civilian population at all, and only be home to businesses, government offices, and those who were in elected office until they left and returned home. The absence of a civilian population would render the fact that DC has no representation in congress moot. But people started living there, causing the problem of having no representation in Congress.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              08 hours ago

              it was also not meant to have a civilian population at all

              Meaning that its population was almost entirely African-American and therefore to be ignored.

            • HubertManne
              link
              fedilink
              423 hours ago

              yeah and the area is run by the federal government so not having federal representation is basically like not having state representation to boot.

          • Nougat
            link
            fedilink
            51 day ago

            And the people who live there don’t have representation in Congress, but that’s not the point.

            The point is that it’s not a state. Just “being a possession of the United States” doesn’t confer statehood.

            • HubertManne
              link
              fedilink
              01 day ago

              yes but again its not typical it was a very specific thing. The land had belonged to two different states. the guam, puerto rico, us virgin islands are similar but dc is in on way similar.

              • Nougat
                link
                fedilink
                31 day ago

                Alaska was purchased by the US in 1867. It didn’t get statehood until 1959.

                Being a possession of the United States of America does not automatically make it a state.

                • HubertManne
                  link
                  fedilink
                  123 hours ago

                  true but its basically a bureaucracy thing at that point. as long as the it has a populace and they seek statehood its going to happen.

      • @NightwingdragonOP
        link
        English
        123 hours ago

        guam and american samoa im not really sure whats going on.

        Population issues. An admittedly quick Google search (so take it for what it’s worth) says that the minimum population is 60,000 adult males. Guam has a population of 172k, so there are either not enough adult males among the 172k (which is unlikely but possible once you factor out women and children under 18), or there are other issues I’m unaware of (including maybe simply not wanting to become a state).

        The other US territories outside of Puerto Rico and Guam typically have populations of less than 50k in total per territory, which would make them way, way too small to be considered for statehood. Admitting them as states would also give them outsized voting power when compared to population size, particularly in the US Senate. But even in the HOR, you’d have one representative from each territory representing roughly the population of a small US city who’s vote would carry weight equal to others that are representing half a million to a million or more each.