• @redisdead
    link
    3
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Woman does something.

    Someone thinks it’s not good.

    “WOW MISOGYNY”

    Plot twist: these tats would also be ugly AF on a guy. Now what, mfer.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -31 month ago

      Plot twist: these tats would also be ugly AF on a guy. Now what, mfer.

      They didn’t just say tattoos are ugly. They went out of his way to focus on how they detract from a woman’s beauty. Not men’s beauty. The subtle “women should look beautiful for me” is what’s not good here.

      Their take could have been worse. They acknowledged that it’s harmless and not their body. That’s good.

      • @redisdead
        link
        11 month ago

        It’s a picture of a woman, why would they talk about men’s beauty? Jesus.

        • Doug Holland
          link
          English
          01 month ago

          Jesus was beautiful, and he had a fabulous tattoo somewhere you’d never guess.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        The subtle “women should look beautiful for me” is what’s not good here.

        Offering benefit of the doubt, one might assume he referred to women’s beauty in particular because this meme is about a woman, or perhaps he isn’t gay/bi, and doesn’t think about men’s beauty. Or both. Or maybe something else. Misogyny is one of the possibilities, sure, but only one of the possibilities. I wouldn’t have phrased it that way, but I don’t think there’s enough there to take the route of condemnation, personally.