• Ogmios
    link
    fedilink
    -27
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Cute, but not at all what I’m doing. I agree fully with you that this dude is fucked in the head. I’m just sick of seeing other sick behaviour getting a pass. I want to see people keep their own personal ideas about sexuality the fuck away from children.

    Fuck me right?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      212 days ago

      From you

      wild hypocrites

      From wiki

      Tu quoque (/tjuːˈkwoʊkwiː/;[1] Latin for ‘you also’) is a discussion technique that intends to discredit the opponent’s argument by attacking the opponent’s own personal behavior and actions as being inconsistent with their argument, so that the opponent appears hypocritical.

      You’re doing exactly that. Nobody is talking about whatever else you’re thinking about and it’s irrelevant.

        • Draconic NEO
          link
          fedilink
          12 days ago

          Not what the discussion in the thread was about and I’m pretty sure the original post wasn’t either.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            42 days ago

            I’m talking about what ogmios was alluding to without ever coming out and saying. It’s a pretty common tactic with transphobes to equate supporting trans kids with letting children make adult decisions. Their “logic” is “if a fourteen year old can’t decide to fuck an adult they can’t possibly be responsible for knowing their gender doesn’t match what they were assigned at birth.”

            • Draconic NEO
              link
              fedilink
              22 days ago

              Ah I see it now, the implication they made is disgusting and transphobic, and also is incredibly off-topic since these weren’t issues that were being brought up here, as in their comment was transphobic and off-topic.

      • Ogmios
        link
        fedilink
        -192 days ago

        I’m not trying to discredit you though. I’m asking you to extend your reasonable assessment of this situation to other situations which people around here remain wilfully blind too.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          182 days ago

          You know where word be a good place to discuss those other issues? In posts about them. This isn’t that. Go make some new content.

          • Ogmios
            link
            fedilink
            -222 days ago

            I’m sorry if you can’t see why there’s a connection between this guy arguing for exposing children to sexuality and the exposure of children to sexuality elsewhere, but a reasonable person should be able too.

            • @MutilationWave
              link
              8
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Maybe I’m just dumb as fuck but what are you talking about?

              You seem to be referencing a different issue but you never say what the issue is. People are downvoting you a lot so I guess other people know what you’re referring to but I have no idea.

              Why be so vague?

            • sunzu2
              link
              fedilink
              72 days ago

              exposing children to sexuality

              WTF is this supposed to mean?

              Nobody is stopping kids from fucking each other

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                6
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I think maybe they are one of those people who equates transgender hormone treatment and/or sex ed that includes information on homosexuality to sexual abuse, not sure what else this vagueposting would be about

                • Draconic NEO
                  link
                  fedilink
                  22 days ago

                  It would seem they are most likely one of those TERF assholes who are anti-sex-ed and also violently against trans affirming care.