@ampersandrew to GamesEnglish • 3 days agoVideo Games Can’t Afford to Look This Goodwww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square131arrow-up1211arrow-down120cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1191arrow-down1external-linkVideo Games Can’t Afford to Look This Goodwww.nytimes.com@ampersandrew to GamesEnglish • 3 days agomessage-square131cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️linkfedilinkEnglish6•3 days agoOh man… I still can’t read it because of the atrocious background. I was hoping this link would have just been normal text.
minus-squaremoxlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-23 days agoYou can select the text that’s over that background to make reading easier. Most of the article is below it, so you should be fine after a couple taps of Page Down. Or use Firefox reader view, which cleans it right up. :)
minus-square@ampersandrewOPlinkEnglish-2•3 days agoI linked the gift article. This link shouldn’t be necessary, right?
minus-squaremoxlinkfedilinkEnglish21•edit-23 days agoThe archive link: Doesn’t have a tracker. Works with scripts disabled (good privacy & security practice). Will still be useful when nytimes.com eventually disables your gift ID or takes the article down.
https://archive.today/noVq5
Oh man… I still can’t read it because of the atrocious background. I was hoping this link would have just been normal text.
Firefox reader mode fixes that background.
You can select the text that’s over that background to make reading easier. Most of the article is below it, so you should be fine after a couple taps of Page Down.
Or use Firefox reader view, which cleans it right up. :)
I linked the gift article. This link shouldn’t be necessary, right?
The archive link:
Fair enough.