@BonesOfTheMoonM to InsanePeopleFacebook • 2 months agoSovcit doesn't understand.imagemessage-square45arrow-up1308arrow-down15
arrow-up1303arrow-down1imageSovcit doesn't understand.@BonesOfTheMoonM to InsanePeopleFacebook • 2 months agomessage-square45
minus-square@PunnyNamelink47•2 months agoNo. One of my favorite insults is: “Just because you didn’t learn, doesn’t mean they didn’t teach.”
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•2 months agoNot when you only have two brain cells orbiting within an empty head.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 months ago“So next time someone’s teaching why don’t you get taught.” implies that getting taught requires someone teaching, but does not automatically follow said teaching.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 months agoNo but it does imply that getting taught requires learning, which is what the OP actually says instead of teaching.
I think someone’s going to be taught a few laws…
Does teaching imply learning?
No. One of my favorite insults is:
“Just because you didn’t learn, doesn’t mean they didn’t teach.”
Not when you only have two brain cells orbiting within an empty head.
Orbiting implies gravity. Gravity implies mass.
Checks out, they’re extremely dense
Fighting for second place.
They aren’t mutually inclusive.
“So next time someone’s teaching why don’t you get taught.” implies that getting taught requires someone teaching, but does not automatically follow said teaching.
No but it does imply that getting taught requires learning, which is what the OP actually says instead of teaching.