- cross-posted to:
- leopardsatemyface
- cross-posted to:
- leopardsatemyface
Summary
Key leaders of the “Abandon Harris” movement, which encouraged voters to oppose Kamala Harris due to U.S. support for Israel during the Gaza war, are now expressing unease about Trump’s incoming administration.
Many in the movement, including prominent Muslim leaders, voted for Trump hoping he would bring peace to the Middle East.
However, concerns are growing over his Cabinet picks, such as Mike Huckabee and Tulsi Gabbard, which some see as troubling for Muslim communities.
It quite literally is a reduction of harm. If two options are presented one is extremely harmful and one is slightly harmful, then voting for the slightly harmful one is a reduction of harm. Harm. reduction.
I don’t know what you are talking about with “harm reduction has a specific meaning…voting is not harm reduction.” because the words literally mean a reduction in the amount of harm, whether active or potential.
Even if you can provide an alternate definition, that is more of an example of the versatility of the language allowing multiple definitions, than any commentary on the current subject.
Some people literally think the term only belongs at the methadone clinic.
That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. Thanks for telling me what they won’t. And I shouldn’t be surprised people are that stupid, but somehow new lows always abound.
no harm was reduced by voting for kamala
I’ve got some interesting information for you about how voting works
I could donate a million dollars to the homeless tomorrow if I do well at roulette tonight. if I play roulette, is that harm reduction?
Removed by mod