I went on amiunique.com, and it says that I’m unique.

Lowest scores: list of fonts JS (0.01%), canvas (0.00%), media devices (0.00%), user agent (0.11%), and audio data (0.80%)

I use Linux Mint Debian edition, Librewolf browser, and Mullvad VPN. How do I become less unique?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 months ago

    One of the points of Libre Wolf is to make you unique, but each session should be unique.

    You can find some additional setting tweaks here: https://librewolf.net/docs/settings/

    The “letterboxing” feature is an additional uniqueness feature you could consider enabling.

    I’m particular you could check your result in this experiment: https://fpresearch.httpjames.space/

    Try it in both normal and in a private tab, then record those results, reopen Libre Wolf, and try again.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Can you explain what I’m supposed to be looking for in that .space link? What’s the server code and client code? Am I trying to see if the emojis and number at the bottom changes when I reopen the site?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        So server code is your fingerprint based on what a server is able to see. This would be your fingerprint with JS disabled, essential. Client code is the JS generated fingerprint.

        For the emojis I have no idea.

        • Zloubida
          link
          12 months ago

          So, if I have the same client code and a different server code, I’m followable only as long as I have JS enabled?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          So … Again, what is the point of this test, lol. What am i looking for? It seems like no one actually knows what the hell this test is showing, lol. Idk why it was posted if no one knows what it’s showing? Do you know what I’m supposed to be looking for?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            The test is simply showing two fingerprints for your browser. One, the server fingerprint, is one that any tracker can see. The other, the client fingerprint, is what can be used if you have Javascript enabled.

            Instead of inundating you with test results, this one is simple - check to see if your fingerprints change between browsing sessions. If they don’t change, that means you can be tracked. In which case you can mess with settings and try again.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -12 months ago

              Mine appears to change each time between browser sessions on a semi-hardened firefox. No clue what the bottom section means though.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                The bottom result (the % certain one) is just a fuzzy match of similar fingerprints AFAICT.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -12 months ago

                  So should both the server and client codes change each time you reopen a new browser session? Or just the client?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    12 months ago

                    Both should if your goal is to not have a reusable fingerprint (which for a privacy focus would be). Server should change more frequently since it has access to less information about the browser. Server based fingerprinting is fairly unreliable, client side uses Javascript to generate more bits of unique data.