@cm0002 to Lemmy Shitpost • 1 day agoOh well...lemmy.mlimagemessage-square108arrow-up11.05Karrow-down17cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.04Karrow-down1imageOh well...lemmy.ml@cm0002 to Lemmy Shitpost • 1 day agomessage-square108cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareQueen HawlSeralinkfedilinkEnglish3•edit-211 hours agoYeah, but it can’t be in direct retalliation, it must be based on work performance. Normally the former is hard to prove, but sometimes it’s obvious.
minus-square@chiliedogglink1•17 hours agoThat’s simply not accurate in 49 out of 50 states. Basically, you can be fired for any reason aside from membership in a protected class. But if you are terminated without cause, you can collect unemployment, which the further employer is required to pay.
Yeah, but it can’t be in direct retalliation, it must be based on work performance. Normally the former is hard to prove, but sometimes it’s obvious.
That’s simply not accurate in 49 out of 50 states.
Basically, you can be fired for any reason aside from membership in a protected class.
But if you are terminated without cause, you can collect unemployment, which the further employer is required to pay.