Not signing up. But I’ll take a guess. “Democrats chose to embrace trans people” (even though they remained closed-lipped), “didn’t court conservative voters” (even though they did), “didn’t tout their achievements with kitchen-table economic issues” (even though they did relentlessly), “didn’t embrace labor” (even though the Rs were actively hostile). The “centrists” got exactly the campaign they wanted but still want to say the left was too left.
I think the original sin was that democrats after Reagan felt they needed to court big business and so Bill Clinton passed NAFTA. NAFTA basically gutted the middle class and accelerated the erosion of union power, which had been the base of democratic power as well. So, the Republican Party now has both the ultra wealthy and the white working poor. This is pretty remarkable given that their interests do not align at all.
After Reagan broke the unions. The funding had to come from somewhere. That’s why Clinton courted the oligarchs. Before Reagan did that, Democrats were heavily funded by, and campaigned for by unions. As Unions and their funds dried up. Democrats weren’t going to pay for media space with fairy dust and farts. But it was still necessary to reach the average disengaged insulated American. Which is most of us.
People really have no idea what the situation is. Pointing to record amounts gathered from small donors in election years. Thinking that should be enough. Without realizing that Republicans/conservatives/oligarchs spend multiples of that amount A YEAR. EVERY YEAR!
People wonder how others can vote for someone so obviously bad. Their mistake is thinking its obvious. There’s a reason conservatives spent the last 40 years creating purposefully partisan outlets and allowing media consolidation. He who controls the media, controls perception.
It’s shocking how often people blame Democrats for things which are clearly Republicans’ fault. If Democrats had better margins and were elected more often working class people would have much better lives.
Yes. There’s still plenty to critique Democrats on. But so many want to crucify Democrats for seeking funding that they don’t like. But they won’t acknowledge the fact that they don’t provide the sort of resources so they don’t have to.
Not signing up. But I’ll take a guess. “Democrats chose to embrace trans people” (even though they remained closed-lipped), “didn’t court conservative voters” (even though they did), “didn’t tout their achievements with kitchen-table economic issues” (even though they did relentlessly), “didn’t embrace labor” (even though the Rs were actively hostile). The “centrists” got exactly the campaign they wanted but still want to say the left was too left.
I think the original sin was that democrats after Reagan felt they needed to court big business and so Bill Clinton passed NAFTA. NAFTA basically gutted the middle class and accelerated the erosion of union power, which had been the base of democratic power as well. So, the Republican Party now has both the ultra wealthy and the white working poor. This is pretty remarkable given that their interests do not align at all.
After Reagan broke the unions. The funding had to come from somewhere. That’s why Clinton courted the oligarchs. Before Reagan did that, Democrats were heavily funded by, and campaigned for by unions. As Unions and their funds dried up. Democrats weren’t going to pay for media space with fairy dust and farts. But it was still necessary to reach the average disengaged insulated American. Which is most of us.
People really have no idea what the situation is. Pointing to record amounts gathered from small donors in election years. Thinking that should be enough. Without realizing that Republicans/conservatives/oligarchs spend multiples of that amount A YEAR. EVERY YEAR!
People wonder how others can vote for someone so obviously bad. Their mistake is thinking its obvious. There’s a reason conservatives spent the last 40 years creating purposefully partisan outlets and allowing media consolidation. He who controls the media, controls perception.
It’s shocking how often people blame Democrats for things which are clearly Republicans’ fault. If Democrats had better margins and were elected more often working class people would have much better lives.
Yes. There’s still plenty to critique Democrats on. But so many want to crucify Democrats for seeking funding that they don’t like. But they won’t acknowledge the fact that they don’t provide the sort of resources so they don’t have to.
The article opens up talking about NAFTA, so at least it’s starting from the right angle: policy and international forces.
Well, Republicans are more likely to identify as working class than Democrats.
So you admit to not reading the article, but still proceed to critique what you assume it contains. And get up voted!
Nobody read the article and he said what people want to hear.