plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.orgM to theyknew@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish · 3 months agoSoothe away tensionslemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up1458arrow-down17
arrow-up1451arrow-down1imageSoothe away tensionslemmy.sdf.orgplumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.orgM to theyknew@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square73fedilink
minus-squareSanctimoniousApe@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·edit-23 months agoI think that hairstyle was popular in the mid-1960s - if I’m right, that’s roughly $50 in today’s money. Edit: source is https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/ using the year 1965, and the official US government inflation calculator seems to concur.
minus-squaremosiacmango@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·3 months agoIm guessing the year is 1970. That $5 is equivalent to $31 now. Bought right for a cheap, but otherwise quality vibrator.
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 months agoThere are Aliexpress vibrators roughly that price right now. They probably break right away, and the plastic is questionable to insert into the human body, but they exist.
minus-squareChrislinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 months agoPlastic from that era probably has the same descriptors.
All I see is that it costs 4,99
I think that hairstyle was popular in the mid-1960s - if I’m right, that’s roughly $50 in today’s money.
Edit: source is https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/ using the year 1965, and the official US government inflation calculator seems to concur.
Im guessing the year is 1970. That $5 is equivalent to $31 now.
Bought right for a cheap, but otherwise quality vibrator.
There are Aliexpress vibrators roughly that price right now. They probably break right away, and the plastic is questionable to insert into the human body, but they exist.
Plastic from that era probably has the same descriptors.