• Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I personally have no issues with it, but a lot of people really dislike things like snaps (seen as reinventing the wheel of flatpaks and using closed source backend to do it no less) and Canonical really sadly does have a history of making some really silly and thoughtless mistakes which were all bad for the Ubuntu community. I can see an understand those arguments’ validity, but I do think they’re just a little silly because there’s far worse companies doing far worse things out there than Canonical.

    Anyway, I still like Ubuntu but I know it gets a lot of hate so I like to poke fun. Xubuntu is like my ride-or-die for old hardware.

    • Lem Jukes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      116 days ago

      As someone who’s in the process of moving to an almost fully Linux environment but only has experience using Ubuntu. Is there a lateral alternative or ‘step-up’ distro you would recommend I try given the downsides of Canonical/ubuntu?

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        216 days ago

        Mint is generally the suggested new go-to for newbies, as I understand it, because it’s probably the closest to Ubuntu but has snaps disabled.

        Debian if you’re going for something more pure, but they are a lot less current, albeit more stable due to that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        96 days ago

        If you want start menu and taskbar, Linux Mint. It was based on Ubuntu so under the hood is very similar but the desktop is more Windows like.

        If you want a similar experience to Ubuntu then Fedora, which uses the Gnome desktop environment like Ubuntu but without all the Ubuntu changes. Plus Fedora does some things in different ways under the hood so there is a learning experience that is a nice stepping stone rather than being thrown in the deep end.

        • VindictiveJudge
          link
          English
          76 days ago

          I tried raw Gnome and hated it. Ubuntu’s changes made it actually usable. At the same time, I don’t really like all those DEs that just mimic XP.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            15 days ago

            Interesting. I love Vanilla Gnome over Ubuntu’s version. What do you prefer from Ubuntu that I might have overlooked?

            • VindictiveJudge
              link
              English
              55 days ago

              The dock/taskbar. Gnome’s default one being hidden in a menu was unpleasant. I did try the dash-to-dock and dash-to-panel extensions, but I preferred Ubuntu’s implementation.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                Ah, OK, it’s a personal preference thing. Personally, that’s one of the things I like over the Ubuntu one.

                I am using a laptop, very limited screen real estate. I wonder if that makes a difference.

      • NaibofTabr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        86 days ago

        I was a primary Kubuntu user for a long time, but I just recently started using EndeavourOS and I’m really liking it so far. It is Arch-based, but a usable system immediately post-install.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        56 days ago

        Seconding the Mint suggestion. I started on Ubuntu ~15 years ago, nowadays I run Mint if I need a GUI, or Debian on anything headless

      • @ysjet
        link
        English
        166 days ago

        If you think Mozilla is the canonical of browsers, you’ve been consuming too much of Google’s anti-mozilla propaganda after they announced v3 manifest.