• federal reverseOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17 days ago

    someone who’s spent some small amount of time defending articles which are clearly propaganda designed to make people mistrustful of anything “green”

    Fwiw, that’s not the reason I crossposted it. I don’t know the motivations of the original poster.

    that’s the goal of the article.

    While granted, the headline is baity, the final section of the article seems fairly solution-oriented.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 days ago

      Yeah, I wasn’t trying to attack your motivations specifically. The other poster was the one with a small history of suspicious postings.

      It’s not just the headline that’s baity… the whole framing is a little weird. I don’t think anyone in the modern day thinks of LNG as a “green” fuel. It’s just a fossil fuel. I did look into the ship a little bit, and apparently this crap about LNG being a “low-emission” fuel as compared with diesel was supposed to be a big deal for constructing it, so maybe the article is pointing out a fair counterargument. It just raises my hackles a little bit whenever I see an article which if you glance at it quickly could leave you with an impression, “And that’s why green is fake!”