Summary

The Biden Administration, through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), is capping overdraft fees at $5, down from $35, starting Oct. 1, 2025.

The move, targeting “junk fees,” could save U.S. consumers $5 billion annually.

The CFPB suggests banks adopt cost-based fees or offer overdraft credit lines while disclosing interest rates.

Industry groups oppose the rule, and its future is uncertain under a Republican-controlled Congress and the incoming Trump administration.

  • @Supervisor194
    link
    6
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Great another fee that will be reversed in 3 weeks. How about doing this shit four years ago?

    I should not let my bad mood make me post reactionary nonsense without looking into it further.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Only if you ignore the fact that he tried such tactics with the EPA to curb emissions and the courts ruled they didn’t have lawful rights to make those changes without them being directly voted on by Congress. Similar happened with him trying to expand student loans forgiveness with the SAVE act within the department of education. Both of those fall under the executive branch, yet neither got through. Which just goes to show this being under the executive branch does not mean they can get it past the courts unless the conservative judges that blocked those allow it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 days ago

          Except the court has upheld both qualified immunity and presidential absolute immunity; meaning Biden could order the executive to ignore the court as past presidents have done.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 days ago

            That’s not what immunity is. It would make him immune from prosecution for attempting to perform the act, but the act would still be stopped if they don’t want it to occur.

            Ignore the court as past presidents have done? Can you name one time this has happened, because unless you are referring to Abraham Lincoln in the 1800s who was never challenged, I don’t know of any such events.

            The President is not a king

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 days ago

              Andrew Jackson for one. But no, with immunity the act can be done and there’s not much anyone except Congress can do.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                So your saying President: “Banks you can only charge $5” Courts: that’s not constitutional JP Morgan: “fuck off president”

                What is the country going to take them to court and lose?.. who already would have stated the outcome of the case before it started

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 days ago

                  Arrest the bank president, hold them indefinitely without trial. Executive is the enforcement branch, they decide what actually gets done.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    0
                    edit-2
                    5 days ago

                    The bank would sue immediately. The President would be thrown out and we would have to pay restitution out of the tax payers money.

                    It would be a good step at destroying the democratic party though. You decided to illegally arrest the leader of a large corporation, and hold them with no legal means. Really it can ONLY go bad. And the president would definitely be considered a dictator until he was disposed of.

                    Edit: The executive branch isnt to make up rules/laws, as we have seen this corrupt court stick to the idea that presidents who aren’t Republicans must go through Congress to have rules approved, which they just don’t need to listen to his requests, as we saw with him requesting this as a bill in 2021.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      H.R.4277 - Overdraft Protection Act of 2021

      He started this in 2021. Remember he had to start his 4 years trying to wrangle inflation going buck wild. The guy’s not the greatest possible president but he has been working towards shit like this for all 4 years. What we should ask is why did it take so long to pass Congress… Because if the effective start date of a bill occurs during their presidency the Republicans can take credit. Kind of like how Trump changed the sentences of those 3000+ people, and then Biden got the blame by Republicans for pardoning the 1500 left as per the agreement written and signed in March 2020.

      • @RustyEarthfire
        link
        English
        45 days ago

        why did it take so long to pass Congress

        H.R.4277 never did pass Congress; it didn’t even make it to a vote in the House. This new policy is coming from the CFPB.

        Also Biden did not pardon those 1500; he commuted them to time served.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -25 days ago

          Yeah the commuting is what was written up in in the Cares act in 2020.

          The point of the first part was that he didn’t wait until 2024 to do it… he’s been trying to do it since 2021 and getting road blocked. Why it isn’t getting road blocked now? Well it might be to soon to see… but I suspect it’ll go through now